Comments on: Olympia SM9 https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/ a writer's guide to typewriters Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:46:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Olympia's SM-serie: En tidsresa genom skrivmaskinens historia - FranksGarage https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-9881 Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:21:18 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-9881 […] –Typewriterreview.com […]

]]>
By: Stéphane D https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-9635 Wed, 31 May 2023 21:20:47 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-9635 Just ran into another of those rock solid work horses at a yard sale. Perfect working condition, dirty but unshmashed case and… one-digit price (which seller wants to take it back home at the end of the day ?) My third SM9… I love this underestimated typewriter: wonderful feel, great reliability, and not that bland in its early versions. I know only two who can match it: the superb Hermes 3000 and the surprising Triumph Perfekt. Would I recommend an SM9 to a friend ? Of course, and I’ve already done it. Would I buy a fourth one ? Never, they’re way too hefty ! But I was just as determined not to buy a third one…

]]>
By: Thomas Wyse https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-8865 Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:23:15 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-8865 I’ve had two of the first style SM-9s. One was very heavily used and dirty when I got it, and the other was nearly unused. It still had the spiffy wiping cloth with the Olympia logo in the case. They work very reliably, and they print precisely. But they look and feel so boring and dead, and they have a longer key throw than I’d like, even after some adjustment. I had an SG-3 that was about the same. I like my SM-3 better, but I’m just not an Olympia man.

]]>
By: lewolf https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-8550 Tue, 14 Dec 2021 04:27:12 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-8550 In reply to Lee Barnes.

In my opinion they are not the finest, but they are the most practical and best functioning portable in 2021. I don’t know about some of the more obscure German machines, like the Alpina etc., but among the machines most commonly available, the SM9 is the best, especially the ones from the mid-1960s. They feed paper consistently well, much better than the Smith Coronas (Galaxies and previous models with the same core build). The SG1 will feed a page with type already on it (typed by the same machine) to the exact same spot, such that with no extra effort you can type exactly over the letters after re-feeding the page. The SM9 will almost do this. The only downsides to the SM9 are the eraser/correction table along the platen, which is at a bad angle–in this way the SM3 and 4 are superior for making handwritten corrections on the page. It has some plastic where I wish there were metal. And it’s a bit more loud than the Remington Quiet Riter. It’s also not as easy to work on as the Remington and the Smith Coronas. I consider these three models–the Smith Coronas, the Quiet Riter, and the Olympia SMs–in the same class in 2021 for wide availability and quality. But the SM9 out performs the others in terms of touch, print alignment/quality, paper feeding, precision in controls (ribbon selector, carriage release, etc.), and ergonomics. In my opinion, the SM9 is the one to get, all things considered, assuming you will be using it heavily. Even so, all three are better than the others in some way. The Smith Coronas have the most comfortable keytops, are the easiest to work on, and have the best case by far (probably why there are so many of them now in such good condition after all these years). The Remingtons may have the most robust action and they have no plastic where it really matters. They also have really thick rubber on the platen, which I like, and they might be the fastest of the bunch. But the Olympias, especially the SM9, is a professional’s machine.

]]>
By: Steven https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-8398 Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:04:57 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-8398 In reply to Richard Knoppow.

I don’t know, I had a deluxe that only had the carriage release key on the left side.

]]>
By: Lee Barnes https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-4913 Thu, 08 Oct 2020 01:50:35 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-4913 In 1975, I bought a perfect SM-9 at a yard sale for $15. It was my home typewriter when I became a reporter in 1979, and my daughter took it to college with her in 1989. It disappeared about the time she graduated four years later. Two years ago, I bought its twin at a yard sale (again) for $48. Other than the crappy case, it looks like it has never been used. These truly are, in my opinion, the finest portables ever made.

]]>
By: Shahriar Razzaque https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-4781 Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:10:21 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-4781 Any one has 1979 Olympia Monica manual or pdf?

]]>
By: Daniel Marleau https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-3764 Wed, 13 May 2020 13:12:00 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-3764 In reply to ValentinaT.

Check out the manual here — no need to remove platen.

Click to access OlympiaSM9.pdf

Ribbons can be a bit tricky. Use gloves.

]]>
By: ValentinaT https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-3753 Tue, 12 May 2020 18:43:57 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-3753 Nice video and review. I just bought a typewriter that looks really similar to this one and the writing ribbon does not work anymore. I was wondering if anyone could help me to figure out how to remove the platen in order to place a new ribbon.
Thanks 🙂

]]>
By: Richard Knoppow https://typewriterreview.com/2013/10/08/olympia-sm9/comment-page-1/#comment-3468 Fri, 03 Jan 2020 04:17:19 +0000 http://typewriterreview.com/?p=174#comment-3468 In reply to Harvey Ito.

The De Luxe (the way Olympia spells it) has a carriage release key on both sides, the standard model on one side only. There may be other minor differences. The SM-9 De Luxe is about as close to a good office machine as a portable gets.
As far as style, its fine but not distracting.
These machines do not have the spring cushioned keys that the early portables and office machines have. Does not seem to make much difference and I think was expensive.

]]>